Call To Action – All SCOPE Members

We know the badly named “SAFE” Act is unSAFE when it comes to civil liberties like due process.  This fact is never mentioned by Mr. Cuomo nor many of our elected state officials — purposeful ignorance.  They focus on the 2nd Amendment rather than let people know they’re also going after the 4th, 5th, 6th and 14th Amendments.
The SAFE Act (Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013) is touted as a “gun control” law, but it is really about control.  Why?  Because it denies due process to any citizen targeted under the SAFE Act.
No one is talking about this aspect of the so-called SAFE Act.  We need to open that conversation.  Do our elected officials believe all citizens are entitled to due process or not?
Attached are the links to both a 4-minute and an 8-minute video that includes the story of a citizen deprived of his rights. They were produced by volunteers to tell the story of the SAFE Act’s assault on due process.
Listen to a citizen who had his firearms confiscated with no notice, no hearing, no trial and no evidence of mental disability.  As with many other SAFE Act victims, his doctor sent him to a hospital for testing so he could readjust his medication.
The hospital falsely notified the State Police that he was INvoluntarily admitted.  It is a chilling reality – one we are seeing repeated.  And the SAFE Act grants legal immunity to the medical establishment for any such “reporting” errors on their part.
Despite a judge’s order vindicating him, this law-abiding citizen was reported by NY State to the FBI and is no longer eligible to purchase a firearm.  It is extremely complicated and difficult to successfully complete the appeal process.
As we know from the anti-rights groups, if such “laws” work in New York or California, they will be exported to other states.  There is nothing coincidental about this.

Here is where we need you to take action: 
• First, click on the video link and watch the video. If you can, click on the “thumbs up” icon seen on YouTube. If you see it on Facebook or place it there, “Like it” there.
• Second, post and share this message with as many friends, influential groups and websites as possible, such as Facebook, Twitter or others — including your state senator and assembly member. They need to hear this.
Ask them if they believe all citizens are entitled to due process?
Use this elected official “look up tool” to contact your state representatives: capwiz.com/nra/dbq/officials/
The goal is to make this video “go viral” and get as many views by as many people as possible — thousands. We want to do this in order to:
• Alert voters everywhere,
• Hold elected officials accountable –
• And demand they publicly state whether they believe all citizens are entitled to due process. If they believe that, then they need to do something about the SAFE Act.Thank you for helping to defend our Constitutional and civil liberties.

• 4-minute trailer or short version:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9CgatO6ML8&t=17s

• 8-minute or long version:
Read more at this link:

https://newyorkfreedomwatch.com

Tim Andrews
SCOPE President

Poll Results – Should SCOPE Support the Civil Rights Restoration Act?

The Capital District chapter of SCOPE polled it’s members to find out their opinion if SCOPE as a whole should support the Civil Rights Restoration Act, an act sponsored by another gun rights organization.

Poll Results……….Of about 120 members polled, we got about a 20% return, with 22 members for it and 1 member against.  95% of members who returned the poll would like SCOPE to support the Civil Rights Restoration Act in some way.  Comments included…I will support it with word, deed, and my pocketbook….to….no, we should use our resources on something else.

I urge other chapters to poll members to see where they stand on the issue. The extent of support wasn’t discussed in the poll, but can range from support in words, to support in money, to calling for member support in calling/writing representatives about it.

Another NY Gun Grabber – Rep. Kathleen Rice says the NRA is a Becoming a Domestic Security Threat

From downtrend.com:

Rep. Kathleen Rice, a Democrat from New York attacks conservative gun rights advocate and commentator Dana Loesch. Labeling her and the millions and millions of NRA members across the country an increased terror threat.

“I’m just going to say it. #NRA & @DLoesch are quickly becoming domestic security threats under President Trump. We can’t ignore that.”

— Kathleen Rice (@RepKathleenRice) August 11, 2017

CDSCOPE:  She is from The U.S, House of Representatives’ New York’s 4th Congressional District on Long Island and needs to be voted out.  We really need SCOPE chapters in NYC and on Long Island!

ASK before any playdate “Do you keep any guns in the house”

Commentary.  Stick with me here.

The anti gunners have been pushing lately to “ask” the parents where your children go to play “Do you keep any guns in the house”.  They also say to ask what type,  are they secured properly, and what level of safety training do you possess?”  Even Dear Abbey is in on it.

I really don’t think the anti gunners go far enough, after all it is for the safety of the children.  You should also ask, what type of drugs are in the house?  Are all your prescription pill vials equipped with a lock instead of a safety cap, and do you store and lock them all up separately in a safe.  Can I look in your medicine cabinet? What about the illegal drugs you may have, what kind do you have, where is your stash and are they locked up too?  What experience or training to you have with taking drugs?  Do tell.  Don’t mind my asking, it’s for the safety of the children.

There’s more, you should also ask if there is any porn in the house, what type do you keep here: books, magazines, videos, toys, fetish materials? Are they all locked up separately,  and what level of experience or training do you have with them.  Come on now.  It’s for the safety of the children so I’m entitled to ask.

Those “none of your business” questions really worked and I’m glad I asked.  Now the children are safe.

In reality, just say, hey is your house childproof, my kid gets into stuff, bigly. Double check for me.  Thanks.

Mount Vernon’s New “no guns” policy

Mont Vernon changed it’s policy to not allow concealed carry holders to enter Mount Vernon when it previously did.  You can do something, read below and see a sample letter to complain.

From the Freebeacon.com web site:  http://freebeacon.com/issues/virginia-gun-rights-group-protests-new-gun-ban-george-washingtons-home/

From Virginia Citizens Defense League:  Mount Vernon “no guns” policy
************************************************************

Member Ron Klein called the Mount Vernon main number – 703-780-2000 – and asked to speak to a manager or director about their new “no guns” policy. He pointed out that such a policy would only affect law-abiding citizens, while criminals will ignore the sign. George Washington is no doubt rolling in his grave over such a restriction!

Here is a page on their prohibitions:

http://www.mountvernon.org/plan-your-visit/tips-for-your-visit/guidelines/bag-inspection-policy-prohibited-items/

There is a page showing their senior staff names and email addresses at:

http://www.mountvernon.org/about/senior-staff/

http://www.mountvernon.org/preservation/mount-vernon-ladies-association/mount-vernon-ladies-association-board-members/

I suggest both emailing them and calling, too.

Example letter already sent by a member of CDSCOPE:

Hi. Thank you for doing a great job maintaining and running Mount Vernon. You truly deserve to be recognized for such commendable work and I thank you for it. I do have one problem that sincerely bothers me that I hope you can contemplate and fix. I read with dismay recently in a freebeacon.com web site article that you recently changed your policy regarding letting concealed handgun carry holders carry their concealed handguns on site. There are nearly 17 million concealed carry holders in this nation and your policy is bigoted against them. Each concealed carry holder undergoes a background check to purchase a firearm, you couldn’t ask for a more law abiding and trustworthy patron. Concealed carry holders just want to be prepared in case of an emergency. It is the same reason you would have a fire extinguisher in your house, you assume a fire is never going to happen to you, but just in case you want to have a fire extinguisher around to be prepared. The right to keep and bear arms was decided to be an individual right, a civil right, by the supreme court in the Heller case and your policy is denying concealed carriers their constitutional right to protect themselves. This new policy of denying entrance to concealed carry holders exercising their constitutional right, if you think about it deeply, is just as bigoted as a storeowner denying entrance to someone due to the color of their skin, even after the supreme court ruled it was unconstitutional to do so because it was a civil right. I’m sure you would be very angry if someone denied entry to a place today based on their skin color, and these two issues have equivalence. The argument of the safety issue is moot because concealed carriers are safer than the general public and safer than police officers too.

Thank-you for taking the time to read this and I urge you further debate on this issue among your board and to reverse your policy immediately…..because you can. Please forward to all the members of the board and senior staff.

Gia Arnold case update

Gia M. Arnold, the former State Senate candidate who ran on a pro-Second Amendment platform and was arrested for not using a turn signal, possession of an assault rifle, a high capacity magazine, public obstruction, an air soft pistol (originally charged as a handgun), an air soft face mask, and a knife, later charged with second degree obstructing governmental administration and second and third degree criminal possession of a weapon was sentenced to five years’ probation Friday after pleading to possession of an illegal assault rifle.

Articles here

http://buffalonews.com/2017/07/21/gia-arnold-former-state-senate-hopeful-avoids-jail-gun-case/

http://www.niagara-gazette.com/news/local_news/arnold-receives-probation-in-gun-possession-case/article_c65a2dee-3557-5359-bbe1-b5dfb3870966.html

http://www.dailypublic.com/articles/02132016/gia-arnold-and-triggering-ammosexuals

Michigan couples sue state to protect gun rights of foster, adoptive parents

From our Twitter feed twitter.com/CDSCOPE   and

Summarized from the 7/18 Guns.com web site:

According to court documents, the Johnsons were asked by officials to be foster parents to their grandchild, but when the grandfather, concealed pistol license holder, arrived to pick up the youth from the Michigan Health and Human Services’ custody, caseworkers searched him and said he had to provide the serial numbers to all his firearms.  When he questioned caseworkers about the legality of the policy, Johnson was told “if you want to care for your grandson you will have to give up some of your constitutional rights”  (more of the story here)

Comment: they need a list of the serial numbers of all his firearms? The MHHS contact information is here in case you want to call or mail them…..  http://www.michigan.gov/mdhhs/0,5885,7-339–352302–,00.html